kfc stop being noob

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

heartstrings stop being a bitch

im not

im just right

Well, it's kinda spammy posting the same thread over-and-over.... Just bump the old one.

i have made points against that so

no

What are your points, then?

if you'd read the thread you'd know

and if I have to do that then kfc needs to keep his post war confined to one post

1. It's not directed to me. Just repost them.
2. He's not allowed to have his postwar. It's spam.

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

heartstrings stop being a bitch

im not

im just right

Well, it's kinda spammy posting the same thread over-and-over.... Just bump the old one.

i have made points against that so

no

What are your points, then?

if you'd read the thread you'd know

and if I have to do that then kfc needs to keep his post war confined to one post

1. It's not directed to me. Just repost them.
2. He's not allowed to have his postwar. It's spam.

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

heartstrings stop being a bitch

im not

im just right

Well, it's kinda spammy posting the same thread over-and-over.... Just bump the old one.

i have made points against that so

no

What are your points, then?

if you'd read the thread you'd know

and if I have to do that then kfc needs to keep his post war confined to one post

1. It's not directed to me. Just repost them.
2. He's not allowed to have his postwar. It's spam.

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

heartstrings stop being a bitch

im not

im just right

Well, it's kinda spammy posting the same thread over-and-over.... Just bump the old one.

i have made points against that so

no

What are your points, then?

if you'd read the thread you'd know

and if I have to do that then kfc needs to keep his post war confined to one post

i didn't have my post war

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

see what happens when you community-vote a mod

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

ikr we should've gone with ratio but he's ded so

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

see what happens when you community-vote a mod

Apart from this, I think he's doing a decent job.

Just my opinion, but still.

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

the thread was useless spam;you could've just bumped the old thread.
and you already posted the thread like three times before so you got enough chances

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

the thread was useless spam;you could've just bumped the old thread.
and you already posted the thread like three times before so you got enough chances

then you could have told me otherwise
the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here
this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

[quote="HEARTSTRINGS"]

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

the thread was useless spam;you could've just bumped the old thread.
and you already posted the thread like three times before so you got enough chances

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

Actually, if it's recurring you just lock it.

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

the thread was useless spam;you could've just bumped the old thread.
and you already posted the thread like three times before so you got enough chances

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

on the most recent thread

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

and i think im more aware of them than you are

CAN YOU BOTH JUST LET IT GO!?!?

Heartstrings, your thread was locked. Big deal. Get over it.

KFC, she posted something again. Just tell her not to post it anymore. Or delete the old ones.

outahere wrote:

CAN YOU BOTH JUST LET IT GO!?!?

Heartstrings, your thread was locked. Big deal. Get over it.

KFC, she posted something again. Just tell her not to post it anymore. Or delete the old ones.

or we can remove kfc as a mod and go back to how it was the first few days

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

the thread was useless spam;you could've just bumped the old thread.
and you already posted the thread like three times before so you got enough chances

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

on the most recent thread

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

and i think im more aware of them than you are

Quote :

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

lol the forum was pretty active when you made that thread; it didn't really matter

Quote :

and i think im more aware of them than you are

if you were more aware of them than i was then you wouldn't break them

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

outahere wrote:

CAN YOU BOTH JUST LET IT GO!?!?

Heartstrings, your thread was locked. Big deal. Get over it.

KFC, she posted something again. Just tell her not to post it anymore. Or delete the old ones.

or we can remove kfc as a mod and go back to how it was the first few days

The only reason it was like that is because I wasn't very active. I'm sorry, but get over it. Make one thread and contain it to that. If you wish to post multiples of the same thread request the original to be deleted (or archived)

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

the thread was useless spam;you could've just bumped the old thread.
and you already posted the thread like three times before so you got enough chances

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

on the most recent thread

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

and i think im more aware of them than you are

Quote :

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

lol the forum was pretty active when you made that thread; it didn't really matter

Quote :

and i think im more aware of them than you are

if you were more aware of them than i was then you wouldn't break them

"pretty active"

no

"then you wouldn't break them"

except I didn't

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

the thread was useless spam;you could've just bumped the old thread.
and you already posted the thread like three times before so you got enough chances

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

on the most recent thread

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

and i think im more aware of them than you are

Quote :

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

lol the forum was pretty active when you made that thread; it didn't really matter

Quote :

and i think im more aware of them than you are

if you were more aware of them than i was then you wouldn't break them

"pretty active"

no

"then you wouldn't break them"

except I didn't

"no"
yes

"except I didn't"

Quote :

senn wrote:
this forum's definition of spam is something that does not contribute to a conversation or has no conversational value. Or repeatedly saying the same thing.

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

the thread was useless spam;you could've just bumped the old thread.
and you already posted the thread like three times before so you got enough chances

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

on the most recent thread

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

and i think im more aware of them than you are

Quote :

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

lol the forum was pretty active when you made that thread; it didn't really matter

Quote :

and i think im more aware of them than you are

if you were more aware of them than i was then you wouldn't break them

"pretty active"

no

"then you wouldn't break them"

except I didn't

"no"
yes

"except I didn't"

Quote :

senn wrote:
this forum's definition of spam is something that does not contribute to a conversation or has no conversational value. Or repeatedly saying the same thing.

"yes"

no

"this forum's definition of spam is something that does not contribute to a conversation or has no conversational value. Or repeatedly saying the same thing."

except the thread would provide conversational value

there's a difference between an exchange of information an repeatedly posting "lol poop" repeatedly

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

iwantmykfc wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

Senn wrote:

HEARTSTRINGS wrote:

1. no
2. and he still posts about it/relating to it

1. Then don't expect your asking thread to be allowed.
2. Then report it in a PM if it's truly spammy.

outahere wrote:

We still have it. Just not fought with spam.

Alright then.

1. then delete the previous one(s)
2. no he's a mod he should know how to follow the rules he's obviously not a good one

if you punished people for making simple mistakes then we'd all be perma-banned by now

you give them a warning first, then if they continue, you lock
you don't just lock someone's thread

the thread was useless spam;you could've just bumped the old thread.
and you already posted the thread like three times before so you got enough chances

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

Quote :

then you could have told me otherwise

i wasn't a mod then so i didn't think of saying that

on the most recent thread

Quote :

the thread was as much useless spam as everything else posted on here

but you need to understand this; you kept making the thread over and over again

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

Quote :

this is an off topic forum, I'll post whatever pointless shit I feel like posting

yes, but we still have guidelines

and i think im more aware of them than you are

Quote :

which do you want, "Spam" in which replies are given or inactivity

lol the forum was pretty active when you made that thread; it didn't really matter

Quote :

and i think im more aware of them than you are

if you were more aware of them than i was then you wouldn't break them

"pretty active"

no

"then you wouldn't break them"

except I didn't

"no"
yes

"except I didn't"

Quote :

senn wrote:
this forum's definition of spam is something that does not contribute to a conversation or has no conversational value. Or repeatedly saying the same thing.

"yes"

no

"this forum's definition of spam is something that does not contribute to a conversation or has no conversational value. Or repeatedly saying the same thing."

except the thread would provide conversational value

there's a difference between an exchange of information an repeatedly posting "lol poop" repeatedly

Again, stop. Either request the original to be deleted or archived then post it.